Israeli Nukes and the Deep State: Is there anything behind the “conspiracy” theories about the explosion in Beirut?

Israeli Nukes and the Deep State: Is there anything behind the “conspiracy” theories about the explosion in Beirut?

The explosion in Lebanon’s capital Beirut claimed the lives of over 100 people and left 4,000 wounded. The number of casualties is increasing as those seriously injured die off.

Just as the footage of the explosion hit social networks, the world media began to spread theories that mainstream media calls conspiracy theories. Nevertheless, such narratives on occasion contain a fraction of the truth, and are worth at least discussing, if only to discount.

Tactical nuclear weapons

Immediately after the appearance of a video of the explosion with the characteristic mushroom cloud, a number of observers in social networks said that it was very similar to the explosion of a nuclear charge.

Later, some wrote that a tactical nuclear strike on Beirut spread on social networks. As a rule, commentators point to increased Israeli military activity in Syria and near the borders of Lebanon, to the hostility of Israel to the Hezbollah Shia paramilitary organization, as well as to the fact that Israel is the only Middle Eastern country in possession of nuclear weapons.

In the West in particular, the US is actively discussing the effectiveness of the use of tactical nuclear weapons. In other words, the explosion in Beirut could very well have been a result of this type of weapon.

Gordon Duff, international intelligence consultant, former officer of the US Marine Corps and editor of Veterans Today said that “the first explosion was caused by Gabriel anti ship missile of Israel. The second explosion was caused by Israeli Delilah missile from F16. Our country is in complete jeopardy with this lazy and corrupt regime.”

The explosion in Beirut has already been ranked among the most powerful of all those initiated by non-nuclear weapons, and third in history after Hiroshima and Nagasaki. In addition, the year 2020, on August 6 and 9, marks the 75th anniversary of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Seismological Observatory of Jordan has calculated the explosion on the Richter scale at a 4.5.

On the other hand, nuclear contamination is a factor that is not easily concealed; an electronic impulse during a nuclear explosion could have disrupted all electronic devices, but this did not happen. If the Israeli security services wanted to damage Lebanon and launch a major crisis in the country, it would have been easier to set up an ammonium nitrate warehouse explosion.

The mushroom cloud is easy to explain. The mushroom-shaped form is not a distinctive sign of a nuclear explosion. Mushroom clouds are also formed in conventional explosions in the absence of wind and other factors that prevent its formation. Powerful explosions last longer and better maintain the mushroom-shaped shape, due to the fact that the wind can not quickly dispel a large mass of released products of explosion and dust.

Israeli drone

In Lebanon itself, there are rumors that an Israeli plane had been spotted shortly before the explosion. Given Israeli military activity near the borders of Syria and Lebanon, this is likely. On Monday, an Israeli plane struck Syria and the next day, in response to an escalation on the border with Lebanon, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that Israel “will continue to take action to thwart Iran’s military entrenchment in our region,” and “will do whatever is necessary to defend itself.”

However, the very presence of the plane cannot be considered proof that it was the Israeli strike that caused the explosion. On the other hand, it is not correct to accuse anyone who puts forward this version of anti-Semitism. In theory, the possibility of an Israeli air strike or sabotage is certainly not out of the question. For example, the strike could be the result of an airplane or drone failing to reach another target.

In 2019, Lebanon repeatedly observed Israeli drones, the appearance of which coincided with major forest fires in Lebanon.

On July 30, the Lebanese news agency LBCI News published a video of an Israeli arson drone.

The theory that an Israeli drone was involved is actively being spread on social networks.

Israel has naturally completely denied being involved in the incident. Obviously, it is not profitable for Israel to assume responsibility for the tragedy that has led to the deaths of more than a hundred civilians.

We recall that just two years ago, as a result of an Israeli provocation near Syria, a Russian IL-20 aircraft was shot down. Despite the statement of the Russian Defense Ministry, the Zionist state refused to take responsibility for the incident.

The US Deep State

Another version indicating the involvement of American elites in the explosion is also actively spreading online. This theory is supported by the fact that US President Donald Trump, referring to the opinion of some generals, called the explosion an “attack”, and the result of a “bomb”.

However, CNN sources at the Pentagon have denied the president’s statement. The reason for this disagreement may be that the president intentionally (or not) disclosed the actions of the Deep State, according to those propagating this version of events.

In this scenario, the Deep State, allegedly operating independently of Donald Trump, took action, and Trump spoke out to continue his own crusade against the so-called “swamp”.

In particular, according to supporters of QAnon’s conspiracy theory, the US Deep State is trying to start World War in order to distract from other crimes.

Proponents of this theory, which is very popular in the United States, believe that Trump is about to take real action and arrest numerous globalists in the upper echelons of American power.

The truth is out there

If we put aside the crazier elements of these conspiracy theories, they do reveal some fundamental facts, one being that the incident is likely not isolated, and deeply related to the geopolitics of the region.

Above all, these theories are based on distrust in the mainstream media, especially with regard to events in the Middle East. For a long time, the mainstream media have indulged the audience in falsehood and fake news, for instance, regarding alleged chemical weapons attacks in Syria.

The Tragedy of 9/11: a ‘false flag’ operation?

Secondly, there is clear mistrust of the leadership of Western countries and Western intelligence services, especially the CIA and the United States.

At last, and most importantly, the aggressive policies of Israel, including their daily bombings of Gaza and Syria, occupation of the territories of Palestine, Syria and Lebanon, lead people to see an Israeli trace even when there is none to be found. However, we must not forget that this is precisely the image Israel has created for itself, and for a reason.

Proponents of conspiracy theories have made important accusations, and while their answers may be hasty or based on unqualified analysis, they cannot be ignored. These questions need to be analyzed and answered.

This is particularly true of the military and intelligence activities of the US and Israel at the time of the explosion. It would be ideal if the two countries disclosed information for a transparent investigation into the most horrific disaster in the history of Lebanon. However, given that this is a rather unlikely outcome, for the time being, we will be left to create our own theories.

United World International

Independent analytical center where political scientists and experts in international relations from various countries exchange their opinions and views.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


June 2024